As the EMA continues to refine its IDMP implementation approach — including adjustments to PMS migration rules — organizations must shift from a one-time data alignment effort to an ongoing strategy of PMS data comparison and enrichment. Many Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs) are discovering that initial alignment is just the beginning.
In this second session of our IDMP webinar series, we will explore the practical realities of PMS data reconciliation based on experience gained from real customer projects. You will gain insight into common challenges faced during manual data alignment and how discrepancies between internal RIM systems and PMS data (migrated from xEVMPD/SIAMED) can persist or evolve over time.
You will also be introduced to the PMS Compare feature, which enables direct comparison between your RIM data and PMS content — a critical step in preparing for future enrichment activities. This session will highlight the importance of continuous data review, rather than relying on a static or one-off migration strategy.
In this session, we cover:
- The ongoing need for PMS data alignment following EMA’s evolving migration rules
- Challenges encountered during manual data reconciliation and what we’ve learned
- Why internal RIM and PMS data can diverge post-migration — and how to catch it early
- A demonstration of the PMS Compare feature
- Key takeaways for optimizing your data governance strategy going forward
This session is essential for RA and data governance teams preparing for PMS enrichment and long-term IDMP compliance.
